jerry I don’t think he’s addressing the question at all of how evolution (change of the distribution of genes over time).kairosfocus DD, a reason is inherently a reflection of freedom, it is not a blindly mechanical or stochastic link in a.kairosfocus DD, have you forgotten your 487 above? 4) Therefore, in order for C to be a free choice, P must.Origenes KF 551 I have no reason to suppose that my beliefs are true.dogdoc KF, DD, a reason is inherently a reflection of freedom, it is not a blindly mechanical or stochastic link in.5) In order for P to have freely chosen R, P must have. Paxx DogDoc, having more carefully considered your logic.DD called this "proximate freedom" at one point, which is a term I liked. Maybe one day researchers will be able to conduct some tests. Paxx Viola Lee: inaccessible metaphysics.dogdoc Origenes, Your argument - or Haldane's argument, like Plantinga's argument - against naturalism, is unsound: 1) Your argument is that.dogdoc Paxx 5) In order for P to have freely chosen R, P must have reason(s) R’ for that choice.DD called this “proximate freedom” at one point, which is a term I liked. dogdoc Viola, Paxx, that’s what I think.Querius Viola Lee Darn it, Q, I was going to do some other things this evening, but I’ve decided to.– Otangelo Grasso on the difficulties of. The eukaryotic flagellum is an entirely different beast. Elshamah Alan Fox, nested hiearchy? What are you even talking about.Ok, what is the Darwinian process for how. AnimatedDust AF Flagellar argument is BS because there are two families.Alan Fox Otangelo, why are you posting as Elshamah? Is it because you are legion? – Otangelo Grasso on the difficulties of.kairosfocus DD, I will comment on points: >Let’s say you make a choice C for reason R.> 1 - Thus, you.Viola Lee at 566, DD writes, “ just a bit more certain that there is no conceivable, coherent metaphysical speculation that.Again, I can't guarantee when my reply will appear, because there is lots to. Viola Lee re 567: glad you responded, Q.Origenes Dogdoc 1) Your argument is that if naturalism (or materialism etc) is true, then we have no reason to.Alan Fox Ok, what is the Darwinian process for how they came to be? Show your work.bornagain77 AF presents a paper that found even more regulatory complexity in flagella assembly than was first realized.Which side will atheists choose in the war on science? They need to re-evaluate their alliance with progressivism, which is doing science no favours. See also: The progressive war on science takes dead aim at math That will make it hard to talk to people about a lot of science stuff, including science controversies. Some of us remember back to when only the arts disciplines were being ruined. Douglas Murray, “ Will maths succumb to the woke wave?” at Unherdīut then they maybe wouldn’t need so big an army of middle-class government employees people to run their lives… At least it’s clear who this kind of curriculum really benefits. But what about those who struggle?Ī rather basic knowledge of maths would help such people and come in very handy in their lives: in ordering their finances, and working out their day-to-day interactions with others. Murray points out, sensibly, that the smart students will probably learn the math themselves along with the correct blather to spout in response to the timewasters. Elsewhere students will be invited to consider the following question, “Can you suggest resolutions to oppressive mathematical practices?” Douglas Murray, “ Will maths succumb to the woke wave?” at Unherd “How is math manipulated to allow inequality and oppression to exist?” and “How has math been used to resist and liberate people and communities of color from oppression?” Just one of the sub-questions that students will be invited to consider here is “How can we use math to measure the impact of activism?” Because, of course, what matters most in this world is engaging in impactful activism. Other questions demonstrate an equal intellectual deficit. It was bound to happen, of course, and the Seattle school board offers a preview of the Woke curriculum:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |